Monday, February 05, 2018
Let’s Talk About: Anti-GMO Studies
Ever since biotechnology became part of a new, more productive and safer era of agriculture, it has come under criticism. Around the world, activists have attempted to demonize biotechnology using flawed “academic” studies. Some of the accusations linked to these studies include stomach inflammation in pigs fed GM crops, tumors in rats fed GM corn, and death of Monarch larva by Bt corn. Despite the fact that these studies have been discredited or roundly criticized, their results continue to be cited as truth. It is important to analyze the credentials of any study, not just anti-GMO studies, to ensure the information is from a valid source and that the study’s methodology and results are peer-reviewed.
Illinois Farm Bureau Policy
The Illinois Farm Bureau (“IFB”) supports “utilizing science, including unbiased research such as feeding trails, on the development and use of biotechnology enhanced products.” Furthermore, IFB supports “ongoing monitoring of the process of biotechnology product research and approval.”[i]
In 2013, a team of Australian and U.S. researchers published a study in the Journal of Organic Systems that concluded pigs fed a diet of only genetically modified grain showed significantly higher stomach inflammation than pigs fed conventional feed.[ii] Multiple experts and scientists came forward to criticize the study:
In a 2011 French study, European scientists claimed high tumor rates and early death in rats fed GMO corn.[vii] Multiple experts and scientists came forward to criticize the study’s methodology and results:
In 1999, Cornell University researchers claimed that Bt (Bacillus thurengiensis) corn increased the mortality rate of monarch butterflies. The study argued pollen shed from Bt corn would land on milk weed and be consumed by monarch caterpillars. Again, the study’s methodology and researchers’ conclusions were widely discredited; nevertheless, news on the study remains active on Cornell’s website. Further study of Bt corn shows the risk to butterflies is minimal because:
[i] Illinois Farm Bureau. (2015). Biotechnology. Policy Resolutions (pp.49). Bloomington, IL.
[ii] Carman, J.; et.al. A long-term toxicology study on pigs fed a combined genetically modified (GM) soy and GM maize diet. Journal of Organic Systems. June 2013.
[iii] Statement by the AAAS Board of Directors on Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 20 October 2012. Retrieved: July 16, 2013. Web.
[v]McGuire, Jana. “Topic: Pigs Fed GM Diet Suffer Stomach Inflammation.” Engage Farmer Resource Center. June 2013. Web. 30 July 2013.
[vii] Vendomois, Joel; et.al. International Journal of Biological Sciences. A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health. International Journal of Biological Sciences.
[viii] Seralini, Gilles-Eric; et.al. Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. ScienceDirect. 1 November 2012.
[ix] Revkin, Andrew. “Six French Science Academies Dismiss Study Finding GM Corn Harmed Rats.” The New York Times. October 2012. Web. 18 July 2013.
[x]European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Publishes Initial Review on GM Maize and Herbicide Study. EFSA. October 2012. Web. 6 August 2013.
[xi] Radio France International. “French Experts Reject GM Corn Cancer Study.” Radio France International. October 2012. Web. 6 August 2013.
[xii] University of Nebraska. “Do Biotech Crops Harm Monarch Butterflies?” 2005. Web. 6 July 2015
[xiii] University of Nebraska. “Do Biotech Crops Harm Monarch Butterflies?” 2005. Web. 6 July 2015
[xiv] University of Nebraska. “Do Biotech Crops Harm Monarch Butterflies?” 2005. Web. 6 July 2015
For More Info Contact:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Farm. Family. Food.™ is used under license of the Minnesota Farm Bureau Federation
Illinois Agricultural Association Website by Netrix, llc.